LonelyCache

This little fellow needed some love - GC2Y41N

I took care of that right quick.

BP

These are not in Utah:

GC2TWCM Little Whiskey - Colorado - Western Slope
GC2TWCT Little Whiskey Too - Colorado - Western Slope

27.GC2P265 72-4-110(2) UCA - The final location is actually in Utah, Daggett County
26.GC2HMB7 Pearl Plateau - This is in Utah, Uintah County

Yippeeee, my birthday came early this year! Looks great!!! I was on my way to dinner, but can eat later. Many thanks for the hard work!! BP

I am one of the two people who have found that cache. It is a major hump with a very steep finish. It took me about 4 hours to complete the round trip. The other finder is my best bud JeoCacher and he said the same. I hate to question anyone's finds as I have been on the other end many times, but th...

LonelyCache 02 is premium

If you can find someone on LCP with ESRI Arc software experience, it would be quick and easy for them to align the shapefiles of adjacent areas. There is a process called - snapping - that aligns the boundaries of adjacent shapefiles perfectly with no gaps or overlaps. You can define which shapefile...

FYI -

http://gis.utah.gov/sgid-vector-downloa ... c=Counties

Most states should have something similar to the Utah AGRC. If you can work with shapefiles, this should work for you. I did not look to see how accurate these are.

BP

My only heartburn with the "find it once or twice before points are awarded idea" has to do with the caches that have co-hider(s) logging as a finder(s). This will create an unfair situation and/or it will encourage all caches to have co-hiders logging finds.

I too favor the DGP scoring system. To me the terrain and difficulty classes are way too subjective to be of any use for scoring.